Identity
Filter
Visitors
(0) (1) (0) (0) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (61) (0) (0) (0)Subscribers
(0) (0)
Links
Blogs
Democracy
Search
[top-politics] Re: Software initiatives
-
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:36:54PM +0200, ketty wrote:
> On 10/23/06, MG <magnusgus@gmail.com> wrote: > > But how shall a two result situation be handled when we have an > > important vote? > > And who will handle it? > > You could use a selected board for that if you want to :)
Or try to come to a consensus.
As already happens in all voting offices.
echarp – http://leparlement.org/security
+1
-
>> You could use a selected board for that if you want to :)
-See?
>Or try to come to a consensus.
As already happens in all voting offices.
-Is it? And what even if so, if we call a discussion of a badly written or torn ballot a “software problem”, isn’t the people in that voting office a trusted board?
+1
-
> > > You could use a selected board for that if you want to :) > > See?
Of course you could, but it is bad engineering.
> > Or try to come to a consensus. > > > > As already happens in all voting offices. > > Is it? And what even if so, if we call a discussion of a badly written > or torn ballot a “software problem”, isn’t the people in that voting > office a trusted board?
They are not a trusted board.
They are all willing people and parties. They reach a consensus.
echarp – http://leparlement.org
+1
-
-
