On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 12:12:14PM -0000, Gordan Ponjavic wrote:
> echarp wrote: > > A big feature already complete is the P2P part: a parlement instance can > > work as a node in a cluster of parlements! > > > > That makes it a distributed blog accessible by mail and democratically > > moderated by its users. > > > > > > Electoral lists will probably not be technically useful before a > > critical mass. > > Mailing lists and similar stuff are from mine point of view only > fundamentals, not a product. “Democratically” moderated is something we > already have at many other software solutions. > I want to see new product that has obvious use and quality superiority > if I want to promote it around. In this moment parlement has good > fundaments and has service that already exists. In this moment > parlement is offering nothing revolutionary. Sorry.
A decentralized and democratically moderated forum is not new? Can you point me to any such thing? One where everybody can post and where each post is also a forum and a mailing list?
You want a bullet point in a marketing sheet, I’d rather have things that will be directly useful and you can still sell the fact that will be implemented that bullet point and more.
Parlement is a project, a free software one, its potential is also important.
> > Look at “digg”, which parlement is close to in many ways, do you think > > you would need/use EL if there were less than 10 votes on each item? > > What I can see is that you want users before you have a product.
Do you think that what I have done is worse zero? :(
> That is not a way things work. OK. Maybe some other users see use of > decentralized software (yet, news groups work that way, no?) or > “democratic” voting (yet, slashdot and whole bunch of karmic software > works that way, no?) be a product. If that is so, than I will have to > face the fact that I did not see this “revolution” due to some of my > wrong presumptions. If that is not so, than you will have to develop > product first.
I would love you to test and use parlement right now. It is already usable, and in some ways it offers more than SlashDot and Usenet combined. Even more than kuro5hin and digg.
EL are not a feature people will use before a critical mass. To sell parlement on that non-feature will bring a risk of discontentment.
echarp – http://leparlement.org
—~—~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group. To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics?hl=en -~—————~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-
+1