+1
But I disagree with the moralistic tone you set in the text.
echarp
+1
echarp wrote:
> +1 > But I disagree with the moralistic tone you set in the text. > echarp
-M: So you are morally opposed to the moralistic tone? Another one. :-(
shanti
Mark, Seattle WA USA
+1
Thank you guys for your kind words.
Though, what you mention Emmanuel, Id like to clarify if it is possible to make this idea more penetrateing without entering into problematic, regularly misleading concepts.
ATB,
Gale
+1