I am confused as to how to view the messages. I kept clicking, and the message came and went but repeating the process did not work.
I now see Mac Hiavelli msg and suppose I am responding to it. How do I respond directly to the FAQ?
When I click a name, it takes me to choices of message title. I cannot access them. Are they simply votes?
I did not see Mac Hiavelli message on the main parliament page to access it. ??
Bruce
+1
New discussion
Answer
I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card out there in such a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off by second life.
Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life?
I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I do not like the direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these “ideas” and the administration of government are completely absent.
It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. A simple link for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional (abbreviated) post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment on that post.
Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracy by majority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts.
There MUST be POWER! But it must be controlled first by a Constitution which applies to the people as well as the government.
Power must be divided so one element does not have it all. Law is power, Courts are power, Agencies are power (needed to have retirement and health and education etc.)
A bit of history will reveal all so no sense my explaining this.
Bruce Eggum
+2
New discussion
Answer
+1
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:17:53AM +0100, eggy wrote:
I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card out there insuch a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off by second life.Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life?We definitely can. Me, I’m sticking with irc mainly. But klaus, cool guy that he is, has been working on a second life to irc bridge.
We’ll see how it goes, but it’s a great idea!
I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I do not likethe direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these “ideas” andthe administration of government are completely absent.It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. A simplelink for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional (abbreviated)post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment on thatpost.
There also is parlement moderation, which could/should be used to highlight the most interesting parts. Well, that’s the idea anyway.
Then anybody could browse the forum, with the level of details they feel more confortable with.
Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracy bymajority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts.
I think there is mostly one solution: the right to secede. But it’s difficult to even present it…
+2
New discussion
Answer
-1
Yup, I’ll show them! I will secede! (Just call me “the man without a
country”)
Unfortunately, the imperialists win that way too.
On 3/21/07, echarp <emmanuel.charpentier@free.fr> wrote:
+1On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:17:53AM +0100, eggy wrote:I joined second life, than un-joined. I do not like my credit card outthere insuch a place. There are many who feel they have been ripped off bysecond life.Is there an alternative? Can we continue without second life?We definitely can. Me, I’m sticking with irc mainly. But klaus, cool guythat he is, has been working on a second life to irc bridge.We’ll see how it goes, but it’s a great idea!I did go to the Top Politics board. I can access it on site too. I donot likethe direction of these topics. It seems the implementation of these“ideas” andthe administration of government are completely absent.It certainly is not necessary for Parliament to join Top Politics. Asimplelink for those who want to subscribe is sufficient. An occasional(abbreviated)post of a discussion may be appropriate if the poster has a comment onthatpost.There also is parlement moderation, which could/should be used tohighlight the most interesting parts. Well, that’s the idea anyway.Then anybody could browse the forum, with the level of details theyfeel more confortable with.Also, there is no consideration of the obvious destruction of democracybymajority vote. This is a Truth learned from past historical attempts.I think there is mostly one solution: the right to secede. But it’sdifficult to even present it…
—
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA
Urge to Surge
http://tinyurl.com/yndynn
http://www.doinggovernment.com/
Check out my Blog too
http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/
+1
New discussion
Answer
+2
+1
I now see Mac Hiavelli msg and suppose I am responding to it. How do I responddirectly to the FAQ?
I think the main message was in private or something. I don’t have it either. It might be lost!? Will have to dig into that.
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 12:20:59PM +0100, eggy wrote:
Re: FAQ? and setupI am confused as to how to view the messages. I kept clicking, and the messagecame and went but repeating the process did not work.The most important thing to consider, is the filter. But you can override a filter for each element, clicking on the “V” or “>” knobs.
When I click a name, it takes me to choices of message title. I cannot accessthem. Are they simply votes?
You can’t access them? Strange, a click should be all that is needed.
+1
New discussion
Answer