+1
Hey,
Just registered on the TOP website, I agree editing the Wiki is
probably the simplest and fastest option to get the definition agreed
on. Also it seems to me that if the mechanisms of TOP require a lot of
thought and experimentation, defining TOP seems actually pretty
straightforward. Probably deceptively since you appear to have had
extensive discussions on it. I know that when talking to some friends
about the concept of transparency there is no misunderstanding as to
what is meant (ie, when you want to have a look, things are clear).
I’ll try making some edits to the wiki, and then you’ll cut or keep
depending on what you think and off we go.
Have a good weekend,
Serge
+1
Hello Serge.
If you think that would be the finest manner of realising this work, then I am proud to say we have set first competition in project menagement.
IMO, thorough brain stream is really needed for setting proper basic shell for this, where wiki is not as usefull as regular discussion group. Of course, my assumption might be wrong.
ATB,
Gale
+1
Hey,
Modified the wiki over the weekend, tried to keep the elements while adding some and making it more concise overall. Any comments or reaction?
Best regards,
Serge
+4