Serge wrote:
Hey Gale,when you ask what we can do about that, I take “that” to mean “If yes,why don’t we start try and get more developpers involved to build onleparlement….”. The answer I would have is pretty straightforward.For starters we need an accessible and compelling statement ofintention (TOP definition).OK. That is the job we are doing right now.
We also would need to have a proposal athand for what the system should be able of doing (Emmanuel do you havesuch a definition document?).
Indeed. People will need definition (is that right word?) of future system in order of making people interested.
Then again it’s not like it needs to beall slick and pretty since these documents are openstanding, it is moreto provide a reasonable amount of information and direction for peopleto catch up on the idea and decide if they are interested and want toparticipate. Once the starting elements are there, it’s all aboutpublicity.
So, you think we do not get too loud before first two things are realised in satisfying manner? I do agree with this idea, as long as my previous attempts of getting people interested withouth any “catch” is actually far from satisfying experience. I believe we do indeed need to have some “product” first.
Talk on message boards forum, talk with political bloggers,email your address book about it, whatever you can think of to spreadthe word….IMO it’s not exactly easy to do, but it’s really not that hard either,all it takes is to actually get the ball rolling.
OK.
ATB,
Gale
Regards,Serge
-~-~————-~—~——~——————~———-~—~——~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “top-politics” group.
To post to this group, send email to top-politics@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to top-politics-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/top-politics
~————-~——~——~——~———~——~———~—~—-
+1
New discussion
Answer